this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
200 points (97.2% liked)

Games

32636 readers
854 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Pocketpair goes on to say that Palworld has been claimed to infringe on three patents held by Nintendo and The Pokemon Company and that part of the damage is required as compensation.

The first patent is one that most had guessed to be part of the case, as 7545191 refers to the process of capturing and befriending Pokemon, which Palworld apes with its Pal Spheres. The other two patents that are included in the lawsuit, 7493117 and 7528390 haven't been found and detailed just yet, but they're likely also mechanics in Pokemon games that are replicated in Palworld.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I hadn't realized the court was within Japan. Does Palworld conduct business inside the country? I'd think if it was never released there, Japan would have no basis to pull them into a foreign case.

[–] PhenolFight@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Pocketpair (Palworld dev) is also a Japanese company.

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So there are two Japanese companies, what racial bias is there then?

[–] BrowseMan@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Japanese court also tend to privilege big companies...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)