this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
8 points (54.1% liked)

Games

32660 readers
1111 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The monetization of World of Warcraft has evolved significantly since I played during Burning Crusade over 10 years ago. Back then, the model was straightforward - you bought the expansion and paid a subscription fee. That was all you needed to access 100% of the game's content.

Today, I'm noticing through my friends' Discord group that the purchasing model has become much more complex. Beyond the base expansion packs and subscriptions, there are now early access passes, limited-time mounts (like a $90 dinosaur mount), and promotional tie-ins with products like Mountain Dew and Doritos that offer exclusive cosmetic items. Some players are even buying these promotional codes in bulk to resell online.

Example above, someone paid over $200 just to get some of the mountain dew codes..... This shift in monetization strategy raises interesting questions about the direction of the game and MMOs in general. While additional cosmetic options can add variety and personal expression to the game, I wonder about the impact on the player experience and community. Does having these exclusive items create a divide between players who can afford them and those who can't? Or is it simply offering more choices for those who want them?

I'm particularly curious about the psychological aspect of limited-time offers. The "fear of missing out" seems to be a powerful motivator, especially with items that are advertised as never being available again. But is this enhancing the game experience or just creating artificial scarcity?

Looking forward to hearing different perspectives on this, especially from others who've witnessed this evolution firsthand. What do you think about the current monetization approach compared to the simpler model of the past? Has it affected how you engage with the game?

TLDR: WoW's monetization has changed dramatically from the simple expansion + subscription model of the past to include various limited-time purchases and promotions. People today are scalping and reselling thousand of dollars of mountain dew for in game codes

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 26 points 1 week ago (6 children)

What is your obsession with WoW? First you make multiple posts about the costs vs. investing that money, now this? Didn't you also complain about the art style changing, even though multiple people said it's always been like that?

You really just need to understand that different people have different feelings.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This reads like chatgpt garbage also.

[–] PunchingWood@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah and he keeps deleting his posts if they don't perform well and he gets called out for them.

Honestly should just be banned for botting at this point.

[–] Dremor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This was the first of his post to get reported. I don't ban immediately unless it is obviously a bot trying to link to forbidden content.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is it reportable when someone makes low-quality AI-generated posts, even if they're not technically breaking any rules?

[–] Dremor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It could fall under rule 4, but would require to be sure that it is indeed AI generated.
There are people that throws AI accusation around with no evidences other that a gut feeling, so I prefer to be cautious.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Makes sense. It's not conclusive, but this user did make a post with a line like "here's a breakdown you can post to reddit" until I pointed it out.

Not that it matters in this case, because they've already deleted their account.

load more comments (4 replies)