this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
246 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

59653 readers
2807 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Speculation is that ios 18 is communicating with other phones while locked to determine security. This can more likely be a NSA/US empire backdoor than a user protection feature. Lowly police systems are just not on the "hacker list". One way the backdoor could work is that if a "NSA/Mossad list phone" is present, protect the other phones, unless the phones are in an NSA/Mossad secure facility.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Or it could just be using the inactivity reboot feature that was recently added to iOS.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

ok. I'd suspect spy agency back doors if the feature was unannounced. If it was an announced feature, then that is reasonable explanation.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It’s literally a documented feature AND it’s weird super secret spy agency shit is the easiest answer for you tbh.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I thanked you for explanation. OP did not suggest that as an explanation.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

You did though. Lmao

load more comments (3 replies)