this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
502 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59495 readers
3110 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Owners of the affected trucks will require replacement hardware.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (8 children)

It looks like they purposedly made it that way.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (7 children)

He was bragging about the stainless steel being made to withstand bullets and we do live in a large city in the US in a state with basically no gun control, so I told him I could potentially see that coming in useful during rush hour on the freeways.

He had a story for why it was shaped the way it was, the windows are angled at the most aerodynamically possible angle because that’s important for a car that will probably spend 50% of its life stuck at a red light.

He’s obviously drank the kool aid. When I got back to the office I told my current coworkers, and a couple of interns said that car is super dangerous because it basically has no crumple zones. Then they pulled up some YT videos showing tests proving it.

The best part? We’re all engineers. The interns knew about the crumple zone thing. The senior Elon fanboy was just impressed with the window angle and bulletproof doors. I didn’t ask who he voted for, but I can guess.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

But... it does have crumple zones.

The entire front and rear castings are designed to shatter in a high energy collision and crumple.

The size of a crumple zone isn't as important as how it absorbs the energy and dispenses it.

You could have a 20foot crumple zone that's empty and it's be useless.

You can see it crumpled here. They've also posted a different video on the official X account of a crash test but I won't post that to avoid linking them. here.

Since you got something so utterly basic wrong and posted it as true, I can only assume the entire post is fabricated.

Edit: took a screen shot instead of video. It crumples all the way past the front wheels

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You seem nice. Anyway, a crumple zone is assumed to be designed in such a way that it protects the occupants of the vehicle.

No one said it didn’t “crumple” on impact. The problem is that it doesn’t sufficiently crumple in such a way that it dissipates the energy effectively.

In this case, the vehicle’s occupants are still traveling at a decent rate of speed and the material of the vehicle is thick enough so they could potentially sustain head injuries. Other vehicles do not have a similar concern.

Hope your day gets better. Cheers.

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/tesla-cybertrucks-stiff-structure-sharp-design-raise-safety-concerns-experts-2023-12-08/

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You seem nice

It comes and goes.

Have you seen this crash yet where all 4 participants survived?

https://www.motor1.com/news/731526/tesla-cybertruck-crash-auction/

It's trashed, but you can see it got wrecked up to the passenger compartment on the front, and the rear is missing all the way into the back wheels.

Neither of those distances is insignificant for a crumple area. That thing had to be flipping and they absorbed that energy.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)