this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
83 points (96.6% liked)

Games

32660 readers
1137 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 41 points 1 week ago (19 children)

Am I the only one that doesn't really give a shit about ray tracing? For mediocre gains, you get a punch in the face on performance. I'll take 144Hz on a game over ray tracing any day.

[–] nyahlathotep@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

if I can get a solid 60fps with ray-traced reflections, I'll take that over 144. Reflections and shadows do a lot for me

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Same. It depends on the game though, obviously. If I'm playing Deadlock or something similar (fast paced and competitive) I'm not going to go for graphics fidelity. But anything single player? 60 FPS is perfectly fine and ray traced lighting can make a huge visual impact. Both Alan Wake 2 and Cyberpunk looked great with RT and well worth forgoing 100+ FPS.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

I find when I play, if I'm not looking around focusing on the graphics (like playing the game) I don't notice it. Cyberpunk 2077 at 3440x1440 with ray tracing on makes me get like 24FPS. Without it, I can get above 60.

load more comments (16 replies)