this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
612 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
2891 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 34 points 6 days ago (80 children)

$60k per MW or $210M for a nuclear reactors worth (3.5GW). Sure... the reactor will go 24/7 (between maintenance and refuelling down times, and will use less land (1.75km² Vs ~40km²) but at 1% of the cost, why are we still talking about nuclear.

(I'm using the UKs Hinckley Point C power station as reference)

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (7 children)

A MW of solar averages out to about .2 MWh per hour. A MW of nuclear averages about .9 MWh per hour.

But even so as the UK does it, nuclear power isn't worth it. France and China are better examples since they both picked a few designs and mass produced them.

China's experience indicates you can mass produce nuclear relatively cheaply and quickly, having built 35 out of 57GW in the last decade, and another 88GW on the way, however it's not nearly as quick to expand as solar, wind, and fossil fuels.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Nuclear actually around 0.6, because 1/3 is always off for repair and control.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Maybe in the UK where each plant is basically unique instead of having improvements from all the previous iterations. In the US it's around 93%. I don't know how to search China or France's numbers, but I suspect they're similar or better.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

My observations are from France, germany, switzerland though. Maybe we are a bit more careful and by-the-protocol here, who knows.

On the other hand, rarely has one more than 3 blocks here, and a colourful mix of generations. You might be right.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (76 replies)