this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
762 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

59963 readers
3503 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 42 points 3 weeks ago (16 children)

What company could actually afford to buy it other than Google, Meta, or Amazon? Unless they are forced to sell it at a loss, which is fine with me.

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 44 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

By "sell," they could also mean ending up having Chrome just split off from Google, as a new, independent entity that is its own company, without anybody needing to buy it in the first place.

[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The judge would immediately shut that down for creative avoidance. This is an order to sell, not break up. The DOJ specifically indicated behavioural remedies in this case, meaning Google must not remain in control of Chrome.

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

Don’t ya love it when people comment saying something that they think must be true as if it were actually true, without having the slightest idea?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)