this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
721 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

59963 readers
3300 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mikina@programming.dev 77 points 1 week ago (37 children)

I admit I'm kinda disappointed. He pulled out almost perfect assassination that looked well thought out, managed to get away with only a few hickups in his plan as far as his face is considered, and then walks around with a murder weapon and a manifesto in his bag? Shame, really. All he needed was to lay low for a while, grow a beard and he'd probably be OK.

[–] DrFistington@lemmings.world 48 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Don't be disappointed. I guessed he was going to do this, and for good reason. His options were to either, live a life in fear, worrying that one day he would be caught, or, to basically give him self up, and elect for a Jury trial. Jury nullification is one os the most powerful tools available to the average, non-rich american. If he goes through the trial and gets acquited (which only takes 1 juror), then hes a free man, a folk hero, and he sets the precident that killing rich murderers isn't an automatic crime.

What he's doing is the smartest available option, please donate to his legal defense fund.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

and gets acquited (which only takes 1 juror)

Unfortunately this is not true. 1 juror alone can hang the jury, but they'd have to convince all the other jurors to actually render a verdict of not guilty to avoid a mistrial

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Have you ever been on a jury? In my experience it’s 2-4 strong personalities and a bunch of people confused by lawyer speak (because two confident authority figures are telling them to believe e two different things and they can’t reconcile the contradiction) and people who just want to go home and thus go along with the strong personalities.

[–] Rogue@feddit.uk 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Isn't it always said that jurys are made up of people not smart enough to get out of jury duty.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

Some jobs give you your work day wage for jury duty as a benefit. Why not go? Get paid by work to take a break from work and watch live court drama.

There’s value in knowing how it works.

If your job doesn’t pay you, the $15/day, or whatever ridiculous amount, won’t pay your bills so yes, get out of it.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago

... Right, so therefore

1 juror alone can hang the jury, but they'd have to convince all the other jurors to actually render a verdict of not guilty to avoid a mistrial

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

a court case also draws out media coverage, possibly more than an extended search would

load more comments (34 replies)