this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
354 points (93.6% liked)

Games

16800 readers
569 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 55 points 11 months ago (53 children)

It does get a lot of shit and I agree Bethesda is lacking in some creativity departments... but I'd still rate it a solid 6.5-7

I put about 80 hours into it. Enjoyed some aspects, disliked others. It's just HEAVILY mid in my opinion. Worth a playthrough if you like Bethesda rpgs

[–] Bluefold@sh.itjust.works 31 points 11 months ago (21 children)

6.5/7 is fine if you're not paying $70 for the base game. It might be worth it now the costs have come down, but paying a premium price for a mid game justifies some of the shit people gave it.

That said, I played on Game Pass, big fan of the genre, and could only make it a few hours in. Just wasn't for me. But then I really enjoyed The Outer Worlds and people shit on that too.

[–] abraxas@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago (19 children)

It's really weird how many people stop "a few hours in". Modern Bethesda games are notoriously slow-starts. A few hours in is still "training wheels" for the game.

I'm not saying you should go back to it, but how did you know it's not for you that quickly?

As for Outer Worlds. I enjoyed it for what it was, but I'm of the fringe view that it doesn't hold a candle to Starfield. It has more style, but less substance than Starfield IMO.

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I enjoyed Outer Worlds. It doesn't hold a candle to Starfield.

[–] abraxas@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Agreed. I petered out in the early game on playthrough #2. Just decided "this isn't really worth replays"

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (49 replies)