this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
2482 points (97.8% liked)

Memes

45719 readers
1057 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 184 points 10 months ago (75 children)

No one gets a second home until everyone has their first.

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 10 months ago (19 children)

People who own second and third homes aren't even the issue. It's mega corps that literally own tens of thousands of homes each. A better way to go about it is to just progressively tax people more per home. That second home gets taxed at the same rate but any home after is taxed way way way more. If someone can still afford it then that's fine, just more tax money coming in. That and don't let corps own rental properties.

[–] Denjin@lemmings.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Logarithmic scale of increasing property tax rate

[–] CallumWells@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

Not sure if you actually meant logarithmic or exponential. An exponential tax rate would mean that the more you own the next unit of value would be a lot more in tax, while a logarithmic tax rate would mean that the more you own the next unit of value would be a lot less in tax. See x^2^ versus log~2~(x) (or any logarithm base, really). The exponential (x^2^) would start slow and then increase fast, and the logarithmic one would start increasing fast and then go into increasing slowly.

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/7l1turktmc

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (72 replies)