this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
26 points (90.6% liked)

Selfhosted

40347 readers
304 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I've just about got this Docker thing licked. After hundreds of hours, I finally get it, and my dusty millenial ass has joined the 21st century.

-but we have issues

==============================xxxx==============================

The environment:

I have multiple containers running on my local network, including photoprism, Kavita, and Filebrowser. I also installed Heimdall as a startpage. On the local network everything works great.

The entire goal of this project is to have these services accessible from outside the house, from my mobile devices but also with the ability to share links and files with friends.

==============================xxxx==============================

The problem:

Enter Tailscale. I tried port forwarding, having a domain, all that jazz, but it ended up being way too complicated. I don't want just anyone to access my shit, I only want a handful to be able to use services of my choosing in accordance with the user permissions I set up for them. Tailscale was the first thing I tried that worked.

I added my docker instance to tailscale, and when you access the machine, you are correctly taken to my Heimdal start page. Unfortunately, when you click on the icons for my docker services, the browser gives you an "unable to connect" error.

Under my Tailscale admin panel, the services are listed along with their port and IP information. Heimdall (443) and Portainer(8000) are listed as https and http under "type", as expected. The remaining services are listed as "other." (the portainer link doesn't work either)

  • Has anyone else dealt with this?

  • If this has to do with ports, is there an easy way to configure ports without having to re-run the images and make new containers?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ULS@lemmy.ml 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (8 children)

I think...

You need to change the Heimdall urls to the the tailscale urls. I'll update this post soon.

My old set up has openmediavault as the base system.

I installed tailscale directly to that base system. (The OS)

My old ip links in Heimdall stopped working.

From memory... You need to go to the tail scale website dashboard. Iirc by default you have some random numbers as your tailscale URL. The other option is to use their magic DNS which gives you random words as a URL. Either way you will need to edit you Heimdall links. So if it's currently http://192.167.1.1:8096 you need to change it to http://buffalo-cow.tailscale:8096. (Or something to that effect.)

What I did was just duplicate my current Heimdall and used a different port number... Then change all the urls to the tailscale urls.

Your current containers should remain untouched aside from the the Heimdall one with the correct app urls.

Edit: I think an example of the tailscale URL with magic DNS enabled would be something like this. https://amelie-workstation.pango-lin.ts:8096

[–] butt_mountain_69420@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Do these port numbers tell you anything at all? I'm very new to all of this.

https://pasteboard.co/PLxJfeT7AV3g.png

[–] ULS@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The port numbers seem fine. They shouldn't effect the issue you're having to my knowledge.

[–] butt_mountain_69420@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

I think I figured it out, just have to implement the fix. I think the problem is the lack of 443's published by the containers. Looks like I may be able to modify the ports easily in Portainer.

load more comments (5 replies)