What did the creator of the GIF name them? Imagine if a bunch of people read your name wrong, then when you told them how it’s pronounced said that they don’t care, and your mom was wrong to pronounce your name that way.

[–] Risk@feddit.uk 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Eh, I prefer the descriptivist method of language. It's how language evolves over time.

Comparing it to a personal name is a false equivalence. GIF is an acronym, people could enunciate each letter if they so preferred and it would be more accurate/true to creation than even the creator's opinion of how to pronounce it.

[–] w2tpmf@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's not a false equivalence. He named it after the penun butter brand. It was specifically named to be pronounced a certain way.

[–] Risk@feddit.uk 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Oh, okay. That only combats my point about it being a false equivalence. At the end of the day, it's an acronym.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I just don’t think that usual linguistic rules should apply to a thing that a guy literally invented and named.

The person who invented it gets to name it.

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Except he didn't invent the words used to name what he invented. If he had just named it gif and pronounced it jif and non of those letters stood for anything I would see your point, but he didn't. He named it graphic interchange format, shortened to gif. That said, who gives a shit pronounce it how you want. Language evolves anyways.

[–] hardaysknight@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

JPHEG

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Nobody pronounces it with a hard G because of what the G stands for. Acronyms don't work like that. They do it because a hard G is more common when starting words in English than a soft one.

[–] Risk@feddit.uk -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but that doesn't change anything in my mind. Descriptivism FTW!

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You better be consistent, then! Jfeg!

[–] Risk@feddit.uk 2 points 10 months ago

Huh? I don't follow.

[–] Risk@feddit.uk 0 points 10 months ago

Except... all words are invented by someone, sometime.

[–] witheyeandclaw@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I see what you’re saying, and to a point I agree. I see it as people reading it a certain way in their head and becoming attached to how they think it should sound. This happens often because English words especially can have all manner of exceptions to the usual rules of spelling and grammar. There is nothing embarrassing about reading, or at least there shouldn’t be. What I DO find embarrassing is when people find out that they’re pronouncing something differently and flat out disagree with the world about its actual pronounciation.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago

What I DO find embarrassing is when people find out that they’re pronouncing something differently and flat out disagree with the world about its actual pronounciation.

Man, you must be embarrassed all the time when you hear British or American people talk.

Somehow the world can survive and we can understand one another with very different pronunciations of words like "Aluminum", but this... THIS WILL NOT STAND!

[–] Risk@feddit.uk -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I mean, it's only embarrassing for them - if they want to be loud, proud, and wrong that's okay.

But at the same time, they may well set the trend for how it's pronounced in the future.

Lord knows, waDer (i.e. water) started somewhere...

Edit: I'm guessing I offended someone by implying that saying 'wadder' is the wrong way to say water, hahaha.

load more comments (18 replies)