this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
1008 points (96.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54716 readers
229 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In the end, the KIA car company made its cars into subscription models, I really hate this because in the end the car we buy with our own money doesn't feel like it belongs to us. Should we finally buy an old school car ? so as not to be affected by this subscription models or is there a way to crack the software installed in it ?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bogo@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 months ago (12 children)

The cost to maintain the servers to send extremely small packets of data to instruct the car for the entire fleet of cars they sold could be less than $100/m.

[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 19 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Indeed; what we need is a jailbreak and a way to operate these systems on our own independent or third party / aftermarket resources. In a REAL competitive market, someone else could set up a server and offer to run these applications (or others!) for a different price. Not that I'm even particularly fond of capitalism myself nor how vulnerable it makes your car to turn it into an IOT device.

This WILL be hacked though, eventually.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago (4 children)

The question is, who will venture deep enough and understand all the hurdles like the car self-bricking after even trying to peek at the SW or HW.

[–] limelight79@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Someone figured out how to remotely take control of Chrysler vehicles with the Uconnect 8.4 systems a while back. So people are out there working on these things. Also, the more popular the car, the more likely someone is working on it.

To FCA's credit in that case, they listened to the researchers and implemented several fixes very quickly to address the problem. I wouldn't put it past many manufacturers to do the hands-over-the-ears "la la la" thing when faced with the same situation.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] limelight79@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Are you talking about people breaking in and stealing them? While I agree that was a stupid problem, it's quite a bit different than a remote hacker taking over your brakes while you drive.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago

Well, it's only a small step from there. Still, it's dumb and it's hard to trust the cars nowadays. Hell, some of them may be already infected and waiting for order 66.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)