this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
366 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
3438 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world 50 points 10 months ago (16 children)

We need laws around layoffs, stat. It shouldn't be legal for execs to layoff a thousand people and still keep their own jobs. It's their failure that caused the issue in the first place - they've been safe for too long.

[–] RadialMonster@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (11 children)
[–] GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (9 children)

I mean, I'm not a lawmaker, but ideally if execs do layoffs they should either have to also layoff a certain percentage of upper level execs dependent on the # of people laid off, and/or the company or execs should have to pay fees dependent on the # of people laid off.

[–] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 months ago

No C suite bonuses if layoff happened within the year and no share buybacks for companies who initiated layoffs in that year either.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)