this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
320 points (94.7% liked)

Linux

48328 readers
602 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JK_Flip_Flop@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (8 children)

I've got a Surface Pro 5 with the dogshit m3 processor and 4GB of Ram, anyone have any concept of how it'd run under linux? It basically folds at any real task in Windows

[–] themusicman@lemmy.world -5 points 10 months ago (5 children)

It would be smooth as butter with a lightweight desktop (probably not KDE). I suggest Linux Mint XFCE edition

[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"KDE is heavy" is so 2000s. It's been quite a while since KDE is very tight on resources usage. Unless you're running a raspberry or similar, there's no point on constraining yourself with one of those desktops for an everyday use device.

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Everything's about perspective... maybe GNOME became SO bloated that KDE now seems very light. :P

[–] aksdb@feddit.de 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Look on phoronix for benchmarks. Plasma consumes less RAM and CPU than even XFCE.

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Hold on, I was kind of joking, I'm not saying KDE is slow. GNOME for sure is slow as hell.

[–] aksdb@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago

All good, but I think it's really often a misconception that a DE like KDE, which is big and brings tons of features, must be more ressource intensive than a (feature wise) smaller DE. Which, as the benchmarks show, is surprisingly not the case.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)