Technology

59605 readers

3397 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

380

GenAI tools ‘could not exist’ if firms are made to pay copyright (www.computerweekly.com)

submitted 10 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

152 comments fedilink hide all child comments

GenAI tools ‘could not exist’ if firms are made to pay copyright::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MrPoopyButthole@lemm.ee 30 points 10 months ago (6 children)

I keep thinking how great it would be if the federal government made a central server system to access digital content for free via taxes.

All public domain and publicly funded research and content, all in one place. Could also host owned content for people/entities and pay out royalties automatically based on consumption.

There are ways to make this fairly affordable to everyone via taxes, but maybe the big opportunity is it could also allow companies to train AI on all the data for a fat, but fair subscription. The value of that could easily pay for enough to shrink any tax costs for the public.

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

In general, if the US government were smart (and not currently tearing itself apart) it would be creating a generative AI public service like the postal service, potentially even relying on public government documents and the library system for training.

Offer it at effectively cost for the public to use. Would drive innovation and development, nothing produced by it would be copyrightable, and it would put pressure on private options to compete against it.

We can still have the FedEx or DHL of gen AI out there, but they would need to contend with the public option being cheaper and more widely available for use.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So the government gets to ignore copyright, but nobody else?

No thanks.

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Yeah, that's pretty much literally written into the copyright laws...

load more comments (3 replies)