this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
214 points (89.3% liked)

Fediverse

28514 readers
414 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have my problems with Meta, but I'm hoping this will help Mastodon grow

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 63 points 11 months ago (22 children)

Fediverse? Do you mean, the Threadiverse?

I'm being cheeky to illustrate a point - Threads will almost certainly harm the overall health of the Fediverse in the long run, with users relying increasingly more on Threads' instance[s] to use Mastodon services and connect to people.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 6 points 11 months ago (8 children)

Eh, I can see politicians self hosting their own instances from their party or what have you. Same with governments. There is a potential as well that x.com may decide to federate out of survival if it gets too big.

[–] Neato@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Why would they self-host and do work when they could just use Threads? It's not like FB gives a fuck about treasonous political parties.

[–] 520@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The same reason Trump has his own social network.

Own instances give a lot more control. They can be as outrageous as they like, full on Trumpian, even. They can also control what gets said in that space much more effectively, seeing as how they are the mods and admins. And they don't have to worry about Meta or Reddit (I doubt Musk even cares) getting media backlash and removing them from the platform entirely.

Sure, Threads can defed from any controversial instances but it will be trivial to create a mirror that effectively refederates the problem instance.

[–] Neato@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The same reason Trump has his own social network.

Didn't that only start when he was threatened for being kicked off Twitter?

But the other points for censoring ideas make sense.

[–] 520@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Didn't that only start when he was threatened for being kicked off Twitter?

Exactly. No one is gonna kick you off your own platform, or in fediverse terms, your own instance. The most others can do is defed from you, but that's easy enough to get around if you're determined.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)