this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
85 points (92.9% liked)

Linux

63659 readers
791 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

May be a mean sounding question, but I’m genuinely wondering why people would choose Arch/Endevour/whatever (NOT on steam hardware) over another all-in-one distro related to Fedora or Ubuntu. Is it shown that there are significant performance benefits to installing daemons and utilities à la carte? Is there something else I’m missing? Is it because arch users are enthusiasts that enjoy trying to optimize their system?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 39 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (11 children)

Because it is less trouble.

I read comments here all the time. People say Linux does not work with the Wifi on their Macs. Works with mine I say. Wayland does not work and lacks this feature or this and this. What software versions are you using I wonder, it has been fixed for me for ages.

Or how about missing software. Am I downloading tarballs to compile myself? No. Am I finding some random PPA? No. Is that PPA conflicting with a PPA I installed last year? No. Am I fighting the sandboxing on Flatpak? No. M I install everything on my system through the package manager.

Am I trying to do development and discovering that I need newer libraries than my distro ships? No. Am I installing newer software and breaking my package manager? No.

Is my system an unstable house of cards because of all the ways I have had to work around the limitations of my distro? No.

When I read about new software with new features, am I trying it out on my system in a couple days. Yes.

After using Arch, everything else just seems so complicated, limited, and frankly unstable.

I have no idea why people think it is harder. To install maybe. If that is your issue, use EndeavourOS.

[–] tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

yay! Everything is up to date and working better than ever. Manjaro and Endeavour seem okay, too. Sounds like SteamOS 3 will be Arch-based, which would be great news!

Oh, also, AUR is life. And worth mentioning, KDE Wayland, NVidia 3090, Pipewire, and UKI generation. 👌

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wayland is a great example.

Debian user? You may have spent the last two years complaining that Wayland is not ready, that NVIDIA does not work, and that Wayland is too focussed on GNOME. You may move to XFCE if GNOME removes X11 support.

Arch user? Wayland is great and Plasma 6 works flawlessly. There have not been any real NVIDIA problems in a year or two. Maybe you have been enjoying COSMIC, Hyprland, or Niri.

[–] c10l@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I have been using Plasma 6 on Wayland on Debian for way longer than 2 years with no issues.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Awesome.

Not installing Plasma from the default repos on Debian Stable though obviously.

When I say “Debian”, I mean “Debian Stable” which is what I think most people mean when they Debian without qualification.

[–] c10l@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

That’s ok but it’s a bit cheeky to compare something meant primarily to be used as a stable system against a rolling release.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)