this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
220 points (93.3% liked)

Fediverse

28465 readers
455 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Khrux@ttrpg.network 6 points 11 months ago (28 children)

I'm don't totally understand the fediverse and how it works. How does meta making one of their options federated harm the rest of the fediverse?

[–] Marsupial@quokk.au 16 points 11 months ago (20 children)

There is zero benefit to engaging with multi-billion dollar companies.

The harm is they embrace, extend, extinguish the Fediverse and I can easily see the W3C letting them donate and start putting in some features “to protect” the children or media ownership rights or whatever bogus excuse they’ll use to start cracking down on it like every company does every time it gets involved in something.

[–] ampersandrew@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago (14 children)

But then if other instances don't want those features, isn't the worst that can happen that instances just de-federate from Threads? I know the history of EEE, but I don't see how that can even work here.

[–] SamXavia@kbin.run 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Yes if certain instances don't like Threads they can de-federate from it, and I'm sure a few will, Personally I think it should be down to user choice as the users on Threads aren't to bad it's the company that is.

[–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

low quality content ._.

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

the users on Threads aren't to bad

Ehhhh...

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)