this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
91 points (97.9% liked)

Selfhosted

56133 readers
954 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm planning to build several WiFi connected devices for home automation: an AC remote control and air quality sensors. These devices would send data and be controlled through a local server. I'm considering two approaches: running custom software on a server PC (hardware to be determined) or integrating with Home Assistant's protocols and purchasing their hardware. Would using Home Assistant be excessive for this use case?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 49 points 2 days ago (10 children)

If you aren't locked in yet, I'd recommend against WiFi devices. Check Zigbee or similar. It won't clutter your LAN and is independent. You usually need some kind of central station for that but it's worth it imho.

[–] Trilogy3452@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Will do. Is it more for security purposes? Reliability?

[–] tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Both! Connecting Iot devices to your LAN is a security risk, since they sometimes carry malware. Many DDOS these days are performed by smart bulbs or the like. May even sniff in your network. Of course you can firewall them, but why bother with wifi at all then? Zigbee is pretty reliable and works even if your router goes down (you probably can't access Home Assistant Web interface anymore, but zigbee light switches etc will still trigger zigbee bulbs, zigbee thermeters will still report their sensor values etc).

I'm a Zigbee user so I use that in the examples but I'm sure the other options are fine as well.

[–] Trilogy3452@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thank you for the info! I'm guessing that I could use a mini PC with a zigbee adapter to create my own dashboards or bridge to home assistant, unless zigbee hubs offer similar capabilities

[–] tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 3 points 1 day ago

Home Assistant has a great integration, ZHA, which "drives" the Zigbee device. So having the Zigbee dongle on the machine HA runs on is very common. In my case it's a raspberry with a RaspBee dongle but every MINI PC will do. Recommended devices: https://www.home-assistant.io/integrations/zha#recommended-zigbee-radio-adapters-and-modules

The other common setup is using Zigbee2MQTT which allows different devices that communicate over LAN. it's been the go to recommendation as it has some compatibility improvements for devices that don't properly follow the Zigbee standard. ZHA is keeping up though and is natively supported by home assistant. I'm using ZHA and check for compatibility before buying devices.

You can theoretically switch later, but you'll have to reconnect all devices which can be a hassle.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)