this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
71 points (93.8% liked)
Games
16830 readers
755 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The more I read about this lawsuit the less sense it makes. Apple has an actual monopoly, you can't side-load things, nor have different app stores installed, but that's okay, yet Google where the only downside is that you get a popup saying "apps outside the store might contain malware and are not verified by Google" is on the wrong? Does that mean that Google should close themselves more to be legally right? If it is because iOS also makes the hardware does that mean that this is okay on Pixel phones and that on every other phone the manufacturer will need to remove the warning? This result is honestly very confusing and infuriating, the only platform outside of PC that was in any meaningful way open was the only one that lost, yet iOS, PlayStation and Xbox can continue being monopolies when none of them even allows to install third-party apps.
I thought it was about them forcing apps to use their payment system.
Since many apps require Google services to function on android they are using that fact to get a cut of all payments.
They're only forcing apps in the play store to use that payment system, and you're not forced to use any of the Google services (some people root their phones and de-google them, which wouldn't be possible if other apps required google services).
If Steam forced any game on steam to use the steam checkout system it would be somewhat similar. You're not forced to release your game on Steam or the play store, but you do so because it gives you a larger player base, and if you use their services and their servers it makes sense to pay them a fee.
A huge amount of apps that an average user needs are on the playstore and require the services.
Google leverage that to force apps to use their pay services.
Google is using an unrelated thing to force the use of their pay services. Hence monopoly.
It doesn't matter if a tiny percentage don't do that. The vast majority need to.
Ad populus fallacy. Not all apps on the playstore use google services.
Google forces apps they distribute in their store to use their payment service to prevent their services from being used for free while a company makes tons of money using their platform. This is especially important on mobile where free games with micro-transactions are the norm.
Google is forcing the use of their services if you want to use their services, doesn't seem that absurd.
It absolutely does matter, Google doesn't control anything outside of the play store, and they allow you to install things from outside the play store, so it's not a monopoly if people choose to use their store but could distribute their apps without it. That is like claiming Steam has a monopoly over PC and forcing them to allow people to sell games without paying steam for their infrastructure.