this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
51 points (88.1% liked)

Technology

59627 readers
2807 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

'It's definitely backfiring': Seattle ordinance intended to help app delivery workers is 'hurting' them::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yuki2501@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago (17 children)

Did the ordinance specify that the app companies would have to absorb the costs and NOT pass them to the users? No? Ah, well, that explains it then.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago (7 children)

How would that work, really? I can't figure out how that could be regulated.

[–] yuki2501@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (6 children)
  1. Establish a wage floor.

  2. Establish a price cap.

If the corporation can't make a profit from this, then perhaps their business model was not viable in the first place.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A price cap seems to be based on the premise that not having a service at all is better then having it be too expensive. I find that idea very questionable.

[–] yuki2501@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"Let's treat our workers like slaves or else the entire economy will suffer" is a far worse take IMHO.

[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

i don’t think that is what they meant. is that a strawman you’re slaying?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)