this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
688 points (99.1% liked)

Selfhosted

58093 readers
1093 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] psoul@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (19 children)

Is it standard practice to release the security updates on GitHub?

I am a very amateur self hoster and wouldn't go on the github of projects on my own unless I wanted to read the "read me" for install instructions. I am realizing that I got aware I needed to update my Jellyfin container ASAP only thanks to this post. I would have never checked the GitHub.

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago (14 children)

Not really.

Depending on how you install things, the package maintainers usually deal with this, so your next apt update / pacman -Syuv or ... whatever Fedora does... would capture it.

If you've installed this as a container... dunno.. whatever the container update process is (I don't use them)

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Unattended upgrades set to security only and never worry

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's difficult to do security-only updates when the fix is contained within a package update.

Even Microsoft's security updates are a mix with secuirity updates containing feature changes and vice versa.

I usually do an update on 1 random device / VM and if that was ok (inc. watching for any .pacnew files) and then kick Ansible into action for the rest.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Why does unattended upgrades with security only setting not fix this?

This is literally why Debian has distinct repos for security updates.

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 1 points 11 hours ago

Let me know which repo this update appears in.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)