this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
722 points (97.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54716 readers
291 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

While we can be pretty confident that Reddit has its own motivations (i.e. self-interest) for fighting these lawsuits, this is still a good news story for pirates.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 228 points 9 months ago (49 children)

Food for thought: Lemmy instance admins probably can’t afford $800 an hour corporate attorneys to fight off subpoenas.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 95 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Food for though: In the US judges have ruled on multiple occasions that an IP address doesn't actually prove what individual engaged in the act.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 80 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Might I direct you to the huge flaming catastrophe of bullshit known as "the police don't give a fuck lol". All they need to do is make it difficult, costly and time consuming to win and fuck you once you get hit with charges. And would you look at that, the US legal system specializes in all 3 of those! How convenient.

[–] pozbo@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Police can arrest you, but they don't run the courts.

Ie you get brought in on bogus charges and if the only evidence is a number that isn't admissable as evidence you would likely see a mistrial.

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Doesn’t matter, these are unpaid volunteers standing up instances. Most, if not all, have no desire to fight that battle on their own dime.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That’s why it does matter.

Even if they get the IP addrsss from an instance, they can’t use it for anything.

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It doesn’t just stop there.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It kinda does if a judge has decided that an IP address does not identify who the offender was and thus is not enough evidence to bring a case against someone.

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I feel like I don’t need to explain to folks around here that companies will lawyer up and basically use the legal system to harass and intimidate regardless if they have standing or not if they think you are small enough to be bullied into stopping a behavior. Which I assure you your average instance admin is.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The average person getting sued also can't afford an attorney

[–] Trollception@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They sure as hell will find money for an attorney if they are being sued for 10s or 100s of thousands of dollars.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

They'll need one but that doesn't mean they will be able to afford one. The point of these lawsuits is to intimidate, even if they don't win, if people see lives ruined because of the cost to defend, they'll be scared into not pirating. This is a fear campaign.

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The sad reality is no matter how winnable your case is, companies can still bury you for years and consume every free moment of your life and then some. For many people, these court battles become their entire life for several years. It can cost them everything.

[–] Kaldo@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And yet they still want them, so there must be more to the story. I also don't understand why since I have dynamic IP address in EU, unless they can match the ownership to a person at any given time in the past its not useful info.

[–] ben_dover@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

they can. your telco provider knows exactly which ip was assigned to whom at any given time

load more comments (44 replies)