this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
217 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59627 readers
2911 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Walmart, Delta, Chevron and Starbucks are using AI to monitor employee messages::Aware uses AI to analyze companies' employee messages across Slack, Microsoft Teams, Zoom and other communications services.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 47 points 9 months ago (9 children)

There's going to be an article one of these days in Business Insider or something saying "employees increasingly establishing secret outside-of-the-company communication channels and sharing trade secrets over them." And then the companies are going to get all pissy about "muh trade secritssssss" and issue nagging emails to the whole company not to set up Discords to evade their employee monitoring solution that they pay a gorillion dollars a year for. And because it was the CEO's idea, he can't just back down and admit it was wrong. He has to keep doubling down.

Meme format of Principle Skinner from The Simpsons reflecting in the first panel "Am I so out of touch?" and in the second panel saying "No, it's the employees who are wrong."

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's a really interesting point. By forcing more surveillance of casual chat, they're also risking confidential information being discussed on outside channels.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 months ago

I would assume that for any reasonably large business, with a competant legal team, there is a certain amount of this considered to be an acceptable risk.

Employees discussing shit on your systems? You're (most likely) legally responsible for it if things come to a court room. Employees discussing shit through their own side channels? You've got plausible deniability of awareness and a strong legal argument for it being outside of your responsibilty due to having no control of it.

This is literally a strategy for some shady and unscrupulous companies to attempt to avoid liability. Conduct any questionable communication over official "unofficial" third party channels.

load more comments (7 replies)