this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
750 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
4202 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 183 points 9 months ago (15 children)

Read everyone, this is hype, and Canada is being dumb on this one.

The Flipper Zero is also incapable of defeating keyless systems that rely on rolling codes, a protection that's been in place since the 1990s that essentially transmits a different electronic key signal each time a key is pressed to lock or unlock a door.

Most of this reaction is due to staged videos on TikTok and politicians not understanding technology. Maybe they'll stop a few joyriding kids, but car thiefs aren't using F0s.

[–] Player2@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago (4 children)

With a jammer it's definitely possible to bypass rolling codes with Flipper, but it's only temporary and has limited usefulness

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That isn’t bypassing rolling codes, that’s capturing a single code while preventing it from reaching the car.

And once the code is used once, or the fob gets a new code to the car, the previously captured code is useless.

This isn’t the same thing as bypassing rolling codes.

[–] Player2@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Hmm, I don't know the precise terminology, I meant bypass as a way to temporarily get around the rolling code system without actually breaking the code itself. You're probably right though

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)