this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
215 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
3376 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/11820406

Do not use 2 letter country TLDs!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 14 points 9 months ago (5 children)

What's wrong with 2 letter country TLDs?

.uk .de .us .nl etc all seem like okay candidates

[–] thejevans@lemmy.ml 15 points 9 months ago (3 children)

The problem is who controls them. The government of each country can decide at any moment that they want to take control of their TLD and remove any sites that they don't like. It's just not good practice if you want your site to stick around.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Right. So how do you differentiate between the 2-letters ones and 3+? Each TLD can have domains requisitiioned by a government, even if its indirect through ICANN.

[–] thejevans@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

ICANN is certainly not perfect, but there is a difference between the automatic control that countries have over their ccTLD and the control they have through ICANN.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 1 points 9 months ago

The US regularly seize domains, even those with foreign registrars. I don't feel that any tld is immune from this. Sure there are some TLDs more at risk than others, like .af being in control of the Taliban, but I'd also say US controlled TLDs are not the least at risk.

Some interesting articles about this

https://www.securityweek.com/country-specific-web-domains-cant-be-seized-icann/

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_In_Our_Sites

https://www.wired.com/2012/03/feds-seize-foreign-sites/

load more comments (1 replies)