Linux

48310 readers

985 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

336

announcing freenginx.org (mailman.nginx.org)

submitted 9 months ago by exception4289@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

50 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Maxim Dounin announces the freenginx project.

As such, starting from today, I will no longer participate in nginx development as run by F5. Instead, I’m starting an alternative project, which is going to be run by developers, and not corporate entities:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lemmylem@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (15 children)

Is AGPL really bad?

[–] AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago (14 children)

No, it's very good, corpo lovers however hate it because it cuts the hands of corpo trash and also lax licenses

[+] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml -10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (13 children)

It's really good that I cannot statically link with something GPL or AGPL licensed without licensing my software GPL?

GNU is failing, in the rise of Chimera Linux.

corpo lovers however hate it

(After capitalism is socialism. When corpo can't exist along with the society, we will help you in political and you will help us to get from poverty to capitalism, to achieve socialism as soon as possible?)

because it cuts the hands of corpo trash and also lax licenses

So *GPL aren't considered free software, they are just open source, because they restrict modification and redistribution. Then you borned the term FOSS which is superfluous, to get the BSD license and GPL in the same house?

(GNU still illegally use the term "free software")

[–] lemmylem@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Well, it hinges on your philosophical stance. GNU prioritizes user freedom by licensing every software piece and its derivatives under Free Software licenses like GPL. The advantage lies in creating an environment where constant license checks are unnecessary, providing a more streamlined and freedom-focused user experience.

load more comments (11 replies)