On Feb. 6, a group of families met to lobby senators on issues affecting the local transgender community in Georgia. One mother, Lena Kotler, decided to take her two children with her to give the topic a human face. While waiting to meet with Democratic Sen. Kim Jackson, who they had heard was a big supporter of LGBTQ+ rights, another senator passed by — Republican Sen. Carden Summers, the primary sponsor of the state’s bathroom ban bill. Little did he know that one of the children he would be interacting with, Aleix, 8 years old, was a transgender child.
According to Kotler and other families who were present, the senator stopped to say hello. That’s when Kotler spoke to Senator Summers about how she was there with her kids to “talk to legislators about keeping her kids safe.” Although she did not mention that one of her children was trans, they were present with LGBTQ+ signage - something the Senator apparently missed when he knelt down in front of Aleix and said, according to Kotler, “Well you know, we’re working on that and I’m going to protect kids like you.”
Kotler then replied, “Yeah - Alex is trans, and she wants to be safe at school, she wants to go to the bathroom and be safe.”
That is when, according to multiple witnesses, Sen. Summers stood up and fumbled his words, repeating, "I mean, yeah, I'm going to make sure she's safe by going to the right bathroom," continuing to use the correct pronouns for Aleix. When asked if he would make her go to a boy's bathroom, he then allegedly backed away, saying, "You're attacking me," turned around, and walked off quickly.
Recent data shows a sharp rise (at least double the amount since 2017) in children identifying as trans. But I believe it's still controversial as to why this happened.
The same reason there was data showing more people identifying as left-handed once it stopped being taboo and "something to get corrected".
But I guess left-handed people brainwashed our youth as well.
Yes, I know that that is one of the possible explanations of this controversy. But just because you have one explanation, and you think strongly that it's the correct one, doesn't mean it's not controversial.
"But I guess you think" never ends up in a happy place.
Yeah, sorry, that's why I edited my original comment. Was very unfair of me to put words in your mouth (or I guess "fingers" in this case).
Most likely just a gut reaction from all the people I see trying to argue a variation on the "we didn't have so many trans people before this, so something must be turning people trans" idea. Since most people just argue in bad faith, and are not actually looking for an answer.
(Actually I edited 3 times because of grammar, my brain was just not cooperating when it comes to typing).