this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
776 points (99.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54788 readers
669 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

One thing that leaps out at me about this ruling is that courts understand the internet a lot better nowadays. A decade or so ago Sony would have probably gotten away with the argument that Cox profited from the users' piracy; nowadays judges themselves use the internet and are going to go "lolno, they probably would have been Cox customers anyway. It's not like anyone pays for internet connection solely to pirate. And in most areas people don't even have a choice of provider, so how is Cox profiting from this?"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] doc@kbin.social 118 points 9 months ago (8 children)

Ain't nobody going to talk about that guy in the thumbnail eating a CD while wearing that hat? Stock photos are weird.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 9 months ago (3 children)
[–] Agrivar@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Create a Lemmy version! Be the change you want to see.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Stop copying my comments ;D

But actually: I don't want to mod it :/

[–] nintendiator@feddit.cl 7 points 9 months ago

That's okay, you can create subs and not mod them. Lemmy has a sort-of-mechanism to transfer modship already.

load more comments (4 replies)