this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
988 points (79.2% liked)

Fediverse

28704 readers
197 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Xylinna@lemmy.world
MrCenny@lemmy.world
TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
automodbeta@lemmy.world
woelkchen@lemmy.world
988
Dear server admins, please defederate threads.net. Dear users, ask your server admin to defederate threads.net. (mstdn.social)
submitted 1 year ago by mypasswordis1234@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
837 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you're a server admin, please defederate Meta's domain "threads.net"

If you don't run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate "threads.net".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Delusion6903@discuss.online 14 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Too bad people on mastodon don't have the ability to block an instance they find objectionable for themselves-- oh wait.

Not sure about Lemmy, but we can do this on mastodon. I don't need someone else deciding for me.

Tldr? Couldn't disagree more

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I agree, I don't want a blanket ban on Threads. I know Meta is a horrible company, but we shouldn't decide in advance.

Honestly, I'd be very happy to be able to follow people on Threads through my privacy-respecting Mastodon/Lemmy app. Because, let's be serious: we're just a bunch of nerds here. If I want to follow famous people or companies, I'm going to find them on Meta's platforms, not here.

ActivityPub lets me follow those accounts without using Meta's apps, which are famously riddled with ads, trackers and whatnot.

[–] aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It might take time but why not naturally wait for these famous people to expand their network and consider being on lemmy/mastodon? Without having to interact with Threads at all? I feel it would just be a matter of time, and we can adjust on our own terms instead of having to let Threads in.

[–] sour@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

why do you want to follow famous people and companies

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why not? I want to keep up to date with their announcements and products. Famous people could be writers, journalists, whatever.

Following famous people and companies is what 99% of users of "normal" social media do.

[–] sour@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you can join threads

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't want to use Meta's apps, because they're a privacy nightmare. Full of trackers

[–] Yoz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Famous people need regulars to follow them. Get more people like you and me and celebrities will follow.

load more comments (7 replies)