this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
158 points (80.9% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
3501 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The $3499 Apple Vision Pro reportedly costs $1542 to make.

Edit: Archive link https://archive.ph/u4BCi

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] le_saucisson_masquay@sh.itjust.works 47 points 9 months ago (6 children)

bill of materials” for the headset at $1,542, and that doesn’t include the costs of research and development, packaging, marketing or Apple’s profit margin.

Please read it, it's just another version of the "the iPhone cost 500$ to make". Research and especially marketing can sometimes be as much as the material and assembly cost. Id be surprised that apple doesn't make a profit on it, but it might not be close at all to 100% .

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It costing that much in materials seems a bit much though I heard its casing is milled from a brick (probably not literally) of aliminium. Combing the other high tech and mass production aspects I feel like it costing 1k is more believable. But what do I know not even employed in any manfacturing job.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The sensors and optics and custom very high DPI display panel alone pushes the price up

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 9 months ago

Makes sense for the remaining $$$
Totally forgot those.

load more comments (3 replies)