this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
206 points (95.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54669 readers
417 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Cost, ease of use, speed, other good features, etc.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lemmylem@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (8 children)

Is it really that bad? I haven't had any issues torrenting stuff with Mullvad, although I usually don't torrent files above like 20GB

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (4 children)

It's non issue, even with +80 gb files.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 5 points 8 months ago (3 children)

The size of the file doesn't matter. Without port forwarding you won't be able to use things like private trackers without running the risk of getting banned. There's no reason to use a VPN without it if your goal is torrenting.

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I haven't got any private trackers and I want a cheap setup. The only thing I'm paying for is the vpn.

Is the difference really that big and worth it?

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I use AirVPN and it's cheap with port forwarding. Without it, trackers will show you as unconnectable and nobody will be able to download from you unless they've set up port forwarding.

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Thanks, I'll take a look once mine expires.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)