this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
185 points (97.4% liked)

Linux

48328 readers
614 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 51 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (11 children)

I think this is fair. Part of the ethos of Fedora is being a forward-thinking distro that spearheads new solutions.

And Gnome's been pretty great on Wayland for a long time now anyway.

Besides, adding support back is as simple as adding a repo. If you want to enable X11 again, it's a trivial task.

E: apparently not even adding a repo, it's in the base repositories.

[–] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 19 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Wayland isn't all that new anymore anyway.

AFAIK they already defaulted to Wayland years ago, and a few years that I've used it on my work PC I had no problems.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 4 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Wayland is nearly 20 years old...

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Tbf Wayland released 15 years ago but its an ecosystem rather than one tool. Wayland has evolved and other parts of the system have been built and refined. Plus XWayland compatibiliry layer is an essential component as so little software has been rewritten to work with wayland natively.

We're only really now at the point where most users can use wayland by default without errors. But I'm still experiencing software and tools that force me to go back to X11. It makes sense for Fedora to drop X11 as default if it's a more "cutting edge" distro but I don't think Debian for example will be doing so for years to come.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago

I agree with all that your said, but my point is that software age has little to do with when something should be made default. It's about being the right choice, like you said.

[–] Piece_Maker@feddit.uk 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Plus XWayland compatibiliry layer is an essential component as so little software has been rewritten to work with wayland natively.

Basically all Qt4/5/6 software and all GTK 3/4 software works on Wayland natively, outside of a few edge cases... what else is there aside from games?

what else is there aside from games?

The Steam client...

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 1 points 8 months ago

It also means years for Fedora. They have a development cycle too. Things that they announce today might be considered for the next cycle and might actually make it in Fedora two cycles from current.

[–] dukatos@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago

If we keep it up, in 10 years a new project to replace Wayland will be started, and in another 20 it'll be replaced. Not bad, but not great. 3.6 Roentgen.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago

Fedora switched 6 or 7 years ago I think

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Yeah like 2017 or something (Nvidia excluded!)

load more comments (8 replies)