this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
520 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
2838 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Toes@ani.social 104 points 8 months ago (5 children)

I'm surprised that the service works at all in Russia. Isn't there some sort of sanction that disallows that? I think it's time for someone to look into that.

[–] hroderic@lemmy.world 58 points 8 months ago (4 children)

The Russia government is probably happy to have people chatting in an unencrypted service

[–] vox@sopuli.xyz 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

messages between client and server are still encrypted tho so does it really matter

[–] Bristle1744@lemmy.today 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No, because the MITM attack is the relevant government walking up to discord with a paper saying "I do what I want"

Man in the Middle = Government subpoena

[–] ben_dover@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

they are not even "in the middle" but rather "at the very end", since they're just getting the data directly from the service provider instead

[–] Bristle1744@lemmy.today 1 points 8 months ago

No, they are very much in the middle. The attack occurs in the middle between sender and receiver. It doesn't matter when the attack occurs, that is the position in the message chain that the government targets.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)