this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
377 points (87.9% liked)

Technology

59653 readers
2807 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Setting aside the usual arguments on the anti- and pro-AI art debate and the nature of creativity itself, perhaps the negative reaction that the Redditor encountered is part of a sea change in opinion among many people that think corporate AI platforms are exploitive and extractive in nature because their datasets rely on copyrighted material without the original artists' permission. And that's without getting into AI's negative drag on the environment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (6 children)

I take it you spend time going to galleries or the theatre? That you engage with art at the source...

Because if you said something as fucking stupid as "and what art is exciting these days" whilst only consuming media through a screen, that'd make you look and sound really daft.

[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works -3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

I listen to music, read stories, watch movies, play games, etc. Art is so much more than galleries and theatres.

It’d be daft to assume that the only art that matters is the bougie shit. Luckily I’m not some pretentious fuck who thinks that and looks down on what the average person enjoys.

But hey go stare at some Jackson Polack scribbles and discern the deep meaning in a banana stuck to a wall or whatever passes for high brow these days.

[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I don't look down on any of that art. I've read transformation novels written in the last couple of years. I've heard the most amazing original and articulate music. I've played games that have pushed storytelling and visceral experience.

I consider it art too. It's the product of human endeavour, often driving to make something wonderful through effort and skill. It's often an attempt with communicating at an audience.

To denounce it all as "derivative" misunderstands creativity.

That's like saying that language is derivative because someone has already said all of the words... It's not the words that matter but the context in which they are used. This is true of all art. The context of work provides the newness that stops it being derivative.

Sorry, I've got to ask though, can you give me an example of "bougie shit"?

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Sorry, I’ve got to ask though, can you give me an example of “bougie shit”?

(I'm not the one you replied to)

That banksy getting shredded at the art auction. It was beautiful. A gazillion bougie fucks smelling their own farts about the artistic value of getting shown a middle finger, thereby devaluing the finger. A truly bougie understanding of art and banksy called it, made the bougie shit his medium.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)