this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
246 points (96.2% liked)

Greentext

4459 readers
357 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago (9 children)

That scene always had me like “damn elf, Frodo and Bilbo, two bumpkin ass hobbits didn’t let the ring fully control them, yet your holier than thou 1000 year old magical elf ass goes full asshole after being around it for 2 seconds? Y’all weak as fuck.”

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 66 points 8 months ago (7 children)

I never read the books, but it was my understanding that the hobbits were more resilient against the ring precisely because they were bumpkins without ambitions that left them open to corruption

[–] groet@feddit.de 40 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Exactly. Bilbo had the ring for 50+ years and he never used it to get more money fame or power. Because neither interested him. He used it in the end to disappear because he wanted his peace and solitude.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

Not to mention Smeagol. Sure, he got screwed up in the head by the ring thoroughly, but he still just sat with it in a cave.

[–] Fermion@mander.xyz 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The money and fame that Bilbo acquired through his first journey already attracted unwanted attention. It was one of the biggest drawbacks to adventuring.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

It was a marginal increase in both. He was already one of the wealthiest Hobbits on that side of the river and the most famous — being the son of a wealthy Baggins heir and a hot-blooded Took.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)