this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
1063 points (94.0% liked)

Memes

45740 readers
454 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 49 points 8 months ago (17 children)

Which was the point of civilization. To isolate us from that hell.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 21 points 8 months ago (16 children)

Even in a civilization someone has to produce food so you'll survive. Civilization doesn't mean no one has to work.

If you do no work but because of civilization you still have food to eat, it means someone else is working to earn your living for you.

This bizarre meme implies work has no value, and was likely made by a wealthy university socialist that had everything paid for by their parents so doesn't understand the value of work.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (14 children)

This meme does not state no one needs to work. It states you don't need to earn your place among the living. You've already done so by virtue of being born. I think that is a noble goal for a society to uphold. Higher ideals are, of course, what separates us from the realm of animal urges. Once you begin to mix laws of the jungle back into society the point of our isolation from it is subverted. If we truly are the greatest Earth has to offer, surely we can figure so.

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee -1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

In no capitalist society that I know of will you be executed for not working - you have a right to life

What you don't have the right to is someone else to provide for you if you don't give anything back

That said I'm fairly sure with the amount of automation we have everyone should need to put in a whole lot less work than they do to keep society afloat

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What are you saying? That you wouldn't give anything back if not for the threat of homelessness and starvation? I don't need a threat to make the world a better place.

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure I'd give something back but I'm also sure most of it wouldn't be of much use to anyone else, I'd be working on stuff like mods, niche tools for myself that probably 3 people on earth would find useful, and stupid ideas for fun like some streamers get to

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Listen, I don't think it'd be as disasterous for anyone with a passion. The people who would be fucked and have to adjust are the ones whose only goal is get money. Imo thats not a healthy way to be a human as it usually has a price tag of everyone else. Theres constant suffering every day and most of it is in the name of profits. Shit, my boss acts like it'd murder him to get me 10k more a year so I am not below the american median when in reality the company wouldn't even count that as pocket change, I see the revenue and expenses every day. The sociopaths control and benefit from this system and you defend it. Its like a strange stockholm syndrome.

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Passions don't necessary line up with something that's beneficial to society is my point.

Absolutely the distribution of wealth at the moment is far from fair and I wish we could fix that, but I still think short of everything being automated even in a utopia where we do everything perfectly as a society people still have to do jobs they don't want to because there are jobs noone wants to do that need doing

I highly doubt anyone has a passion for working in the service industry, cleaning up the messes kids make at school or collecting people's rubbish but they're jobs that need doing and people do them because they're compensated for them

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What you don't have the right to is someone else to provide for you if you don't give anything back

Yes you do. Lots of people are on disability benefits, unemployment, a pension, or are literal children. And those programs should be expanded to cover everyone who doesn't work, not just those who can justify their existence to a government form.

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In the case of someone who can't work for one reason or another there's obviously an exception because that's not something they can help

Children do contribute to society by getting an education and having a childhood to develop into well adjusted adults who contribute later on,

Unemployment benefits presumably are for people actively searching for a job

The elderly have already contributed more than their fair share raising their children

Using the phrasing people who don't work implies including people who are able but just don't want to

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 2 points 8 months ago

There's nobody like that. You're talking about imaginary people. All human beings have a natural drive to do useful work.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)