this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
47 points (91.2% liked)

Games

16806 readers
867 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
47
"ESO owes it’s success to Robert Altman’s willingness to ignore quarterly results in favor of the long term. And his firm belief that ZeniMax was a family and you don’t layoff family members." (twitter.com)
submitted 8 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 24 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'm just so annoyed, being a gamer and a corporate drone. There are innumerable projects that would make companies money, but they can't handle a few quarters of r&d to get them done. Sometimes you are then tasked with a less successful project, but what's worse is when you go back to useless tasks that bring no value, and then a year later some big brain businessman says "this thing sucks, why don't we have better things".

Games are harder and a long term investment, but that's literally your product, deal with it. So many half ass games right now that could have been amazing and wildly successful if they were smart about it.

One example, Hogwarts Legacy. Very successful at launch, but with an empty world. Why are they not churning out DLCs for that right now?? At this point if they had immediately pivoted to that we could have at least one good story dlc and a handful of addons, and they would be printing cash. Instead they focused on, what was that flop of a game?

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Suicide squad, a live service turd. And it flopped. Big. Meanwhile Hogwards is making tons of money as a normal single player game. So the studio does the only sane thing: they announced they are ditching single player games to focus on live service games.

I swear these companies are run by morons....

[–] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 4 points 7 months ago

That is usually the case. The smart people do the coding, but the morons do the planning and fail upward as people managers generally do.

Either that or narcissists who get to the very top by shouting over everyone else, so the smart opinions don't get taken onboard.