this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
12 points (80.0% liked)

Technology

59653 readers
2807 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (17 children)

While I'm sure there is a crazy markup, it's important to note the cost to produce - as in manufacture - does not include the cost of drug discovery, which is extremely expensive and involves a good amount of risk over a long period of time.

You can't just compare the cost of discovering a new drug vs. cost of producing a generic without any research like that.

[–] clausetrophobic@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

Fuck off with the big pharma apologetics.

Boo hoo the corporation got millions in taxpayer money to develop a vaccine and now they have to profit off of it. I feel so bad for them.

This is subtle astroturfing.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

By that same logic: it costs a couple of cents to burn a dvd or to transfer a few gigabytes, yet games costs $60.

All the commenter above you is saying is don't mix up the cost to develop with the cost to mass produce,

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Game DVDs are not lifesaving drugs.

[–] lemann@lemmy.one -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm going to be unreasonable because I don't like the ethics behind Pharma companies.

They should eat the loss; their research was healthily subsidised by the taxpayer

[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm personally of the opinion that all medical research should be tax funded. But given our current situation, if you tell these companies to 'eat the loss' they will simply stop producing new medicines.

[–] Gordon@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh no, whatever will we do if old dudes can't have 6 different types of boner pills?

[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's real easy to sit on the sidelines and spew hate. Not much of a life though.

[–] Same@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Pharma companies spend a majority of their time trying to make new unique drugs, they just fail most of the time. The ones that succeed tend to be ones that are similar to ones that succeeded in the last, which is why you get multiple drugs in the same class, but it's not all they do. For example, we've essentially cured some types of cystic fibrosis, and there's an effective vaccine for malaria now - all developed in the last 10 years.

I don't want to pretend that the big pharma companies aren't evil, but they do have incentives that align with improving human health.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe -1 points 1 year ago

Oh stop. The government should be running the pharaceutical industry then, not private companies.

Stop simping for evil corporations that don't give a shit about you.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)