this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
110 points (94.4% liked)

Not The Onion

12368 readers
489 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 7 months ago (15 children)

Least entitled Tesla owner.

The charge ports on non-Teslas, meanwhile, are also in a different spot on the vehicle, meaning they may have to park parallel to a Supercharger, taking up two spots. That's what happened here; "I had no choice but to park in a way that blocks two stalls," according to the Rivian driver.

Sounds like this guy sucks too unless there were a bunch of spots open or extenuating circumstances.

Others responded that they thought this type of conflict might happen and that it's "unwise" for Tesla to open chargers to other brands while keeping the "Tesla Charging Only" signs up.

No shit! Why even bother keeping the signs up?

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because not removing the signs requires the least effort/costs less.

(not saying that's a good reason; especially with how entitled Tesla owners tend to be)

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 3 points 7 months ago

Crowdsource it. Everybody go to your local supercharger and remove the "Tesla charging only" signs yourself.

load more comments (13 replies)