this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
247 points (96.3% liked)

Games

16912 readers
392 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago (37 children)

FALLOUT 4 IS FAR FROM THE GREATEST FALLOUT.

I think most people agree Fallout 3 or Fallout New Vegas or that fancy blend of both, take the top spots.

[–] buffaloseven@kbin.social 45 points 8 months ago (31 children)

I describe it to people I know as:

  • Fallout 4 is, far and away, the best "game" of the modern ones. It feels much better to play in almost every way than the other ones. Especially the combat. There's some interesting stuff in it, but it's largely the mechanics that keep you coming back, not the RPG or world.
  • Fallout 3 has perhaps the better realized world out of them all; the way it all fits together is great and there's a lot of rewarding exploration in it.
  • Fallout: New Vegas is, far and away, the best Fallout game...it harkens back to the roots way more and is the best RPG -- by a long shot -- of the 3.

Obviously YMMV and others will feel differently, but that's how I've parsed out this series so far.

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (9 children)

See, what they need to do is update the graphics on 1 & 2. I would definitely replay those, bugs and all. Bozar was of course OP but the way it was so story driven was excellent.

The only issue is the potato graphics.

[–] hand@lemmy.studio 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think that's a little harsh. Can I ask what you feel is wrong with the graphics as they are?

I'm currently playing Fallout and my only issue is the UI scaling, the graphics themselves I find quite charming.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I don't really have a problem with the graphics, but going from memory:

  • They were 8-bit and had visible dithering.

  • They had a 1-bit alpha mask. Either a pixel in a sprite was transparent or not.

It was also a 2D game designed for a relatively low-resolution display. It's gonna be either small or pixelated on a current monitor. That being said, I don't really have great memories of the graphics of 3D isometric conversions of similar 2D isometric games, like the 3D games in the Jagged Alliance series. Silent Storm -- 3D from the get-go -- was functional but not pretty.

You could also argue that the game -- having hand-drawn graphics -- just only had so many frames in things like combat animations:

https://imgur.com/r6BSwpJ

mpv says that that GIF is 9 FPS.

A typical console game has historically been 30 FPS. A lot now are 60 FPS. I have a 165 Hz monitor, and some people use 240 Hz.

I think that the 2D Fallout games are fine, but -- despite being skeptical at first -- I think that the move to 3D made a lot of sense. It does add immersiveness, and they did a pretty good job of converting game mechanics.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)