this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
558 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

59653 readers
2807 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

Not after the fact. They are due process when the government has to prove it's case before it can take punitive action. If the government is allowed to take punitive action without going to court to prove it's needed than there is no due process.

Why is that so hard to understand?

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today -2 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I guess parking tickets aren't due process either, then.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (3 children)

You realize the ticket is actually a court date right? Most people just choose to plead guilty and pay the fine.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That is literally analogous to an FTC fine in every way.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This isn't a fine. And there's no requirement to file charges in court and prove data is being mishandled.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today -2 points 7 months ago

If we're being semantic this isn't an anything because the only thing it says is that the FTC can do FTC things to any company that sends data to an adversarial nation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)