this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
289 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
3376 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Without paywall: https://archive.ph/NGkbf

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rsuri@lemmy.world 93 points 6 months ago (27 children)

Autopilot “is not a self-driving technology and does not replace the driver,” Tesla said in response to a 2020 case filed in Florida. “The driver can and must still brake, accelerate and steer just as if the system is not engaged.”

Tesla's terminology is so confusing. If "Autopilot" isn't self-driving technology, does that mean it's different from "Full Self Driving"? And if so, is "Full Self Driving" also not a self-driving technology?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 66 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (7 children)

I heard Elon Musk call it: "Assisted full self driving". Which doesn't make any sense. LOL

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 46 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"It's called whatever will make the stock price go up."

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But you repeat yourself

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)