this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
297 points (97.4% liked)

Games

16785 readers
830 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (4 children)

How the hell do you make that game in 18 months?! Wow

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)

80% of the game was already made in the form of Fallout 3. 10 years prior NV would have been considered an expansion pack, not a standalone game. Most of what they did was story work and added a few new things like gambling mini games and use the ingame editor to make new npc faces and clothing. It was an impressive undertaking but they still bit off more than they could chew

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ah gotcha. If that had been sold as a DLC it would probably have been the most comprehensive DLC I've ever seen.

[–] Lesrid@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah it's definitely more substantial than something like Blood Dragon for Far Cry 3.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)