this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
863 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

59627 readers
2807 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 187 points 6 months ago (43 children)

Lower power density, higher cycle life, safer. Sounds good for stationary power storage.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Higher cycle life might also make it good for hybrids, since they cycle their batteries a fair bit.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 months ago

For sure. They would likely use a lower capacity battery due to these being much less energy dense, though. Hybrids have been using bigger batteries and only using around a 30% zone of charge state in order to greatly prolong battery degradation. I'd imagine auto makers would try to keep the batteries around the same size, but start using more like a 60 or 70% zone, though. So they'll take advantage of that higher cycle life.

You won't get an automaker to care about making a battery that lasts much beyond 10 years.

load more comments (41 replies)