this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
1716 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
3366 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aux@lemmy.world -3 points 6 months ago (17 children)

That defeats the purpose of a knowledge base. The whole reason why everyone is using SO is that you don't need an account to access it and it's fully indexed by Google.

The real question is why the fuck are people ok with Google indexing SO and not OpenAI? Doesn't make any fucking sense.

[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (16 children)

The real question is why the fuck are people ok with Google indexing SO and not OpenAI? Doesn't make any fucking sense.

Because Google is free and OpenAI isn't. It's one thing to take free content, index it, then allow anyone to access that index. It's another thing when you take free content, index it, then hide that index behind a paywall.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world -3 points 6 months ago (15 children)

Are you sure? Because Google is not free at all, you're paying for it through privacy invasion and ads. While ChatGPT is actually free to use for end users - no ads, nothing.

[–] jnk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The price difference is that google steals your data. That's it. OpenAI steals data, ask for money to use most of their models, and buy even more data from other companies stealing user data (like google and SO). Also indexing web pages is not even the "stealing" part of google, it's just not comparable.

Yes, training AI on user data for free then selling the end product is a reasonable thing to be concerned about. It'd be different if the product was free or the data was sold to them with user consent.

SO has announced a subscription-based service trained on user data for free, and not only there's not even opt-out, they're mass-banning users for trying to "opt-out" manually. Tell me one thing here that's not completely fucked up.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago

But it's free. Unlike Google.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)