this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
338 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Certified "you criticize capitalism yet you live in it" moment

[–] Lavitz@lemmings.world 8 points 6 months ago (4 children)

No ethical way to spend in a capitalist society. It kind of is what it is, cause I gotta eat. Also certified "you criticize capitalism yet you live in it moment" to you sir.

[–] nymwit@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

are all unethical choices equal? Surely there are better and worse things?

[–] Lavitz@lemmings.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No but unethical is unethical so I'm not sure where you're going with this.

[–] nymwit@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Where I was going was: effects can be different even if all choices and results are unethical. If one cares about the possible impacts of ones actions, consideration beyond "well it's all unethical, so whatever" could be warranted.

[–] Lavitz@lemmings.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

You tell yourself whatever you need to to live in this society and be happy. I'm sure the extra $.80 you're spending for the label that says cruelty free, is in fact cruelty free.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)