this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
23 points (87.1% liked)
Games
16812 readers
300 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
Beehaw.org gaming
Lemmy.ml gaming
lemmy.ca pcgaming
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
There is no such thing. But rarely is there less of it than when people slap that label on Fortnite. Christ alive, John Carmack's original plans for Quakeworld were closer to what Snow Crash described, and I'll bet Carmack knows Neal Stephenson was telling a rude joke.
There are many Metaverses like VRChat and Rec Room. Very small still in terms of global users as it is just so insignificant right now, but that will change in the decades to come. Carmack does believe in the Metaverse as he once said:
“I have pretty good reasons to believe that setting out to build the metaverse is not actually the best way to wind up with the metaverse."
I agree. The Metaverse will just emerge naturally as no one really knows what will bring the people right now. Like Walkabout Minigolf has turned out to be a fairly large Metaverse even though few would think of it as such. My VR Theme Park that is online is the same. These are the emerging Metaverses. There will be many more coming. It has to be immersive to be the Metaverse so thinks like Fortnite would not count presently.
Based on what, exactly? Hopes and dreams?
Face it... the metaverse is a dead mall.
Even that reading is giving it too much credit, by calling it what it wants to be. Money-addicts could build The Oasis. They cannot build the metaverse. No individual force can. No more than any single billionaire dork could have built the internet. A network, yes. A network of networks, yes. But it can't be the network of all networks, unless it's a cooperative endeavor of basically everyone.
And it'd never work as-described because a flat objective map of virtual space is dumb as hell. Like asking which website is north of Reddit.
It shouldn't take an in-depth two-hour video to dismiss "virtual real estate." Saying it out loud will do.
Dead? It is still being incubated.