this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
377 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
3435 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] far_university1990@feddit.de 5 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Yes, can see what different between cpu without go to intel page and read spec. Not only that cpu are different.

What mean readable to you?

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

For example being able to get a grasp of the rough performance from the have.

i5 10500 is faster than i5 10400. But is 6p4e better than 4p8e?

It's illusionary to fit everything about a CPU into its name. What you're proposing is essentially the entire value column of the spec sheet concatenated.

[–] far_university1990@feddit.de -1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

if 10500 mean 6p4e and 10400 mean 4p8e, which is faster depend on workload. so compare by that not good and that how currently is.

also if then 10900 is 12p0e, maybe not faster for gaming if game is single thread, so compare broken again. and also not good for mobile device that care about battery life. who tell you that?

and yes, basically that just most important or most compared spec concatenated. which describe the cpu, i think a name is supposed do that.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And how many people do you think could accurately, or even ballpark, estimate their workload? I couldn't tell you, whether my workload would benefit from more e or p cores and by how much.

What you're implying here is an illusion of accuracy. You want accurate numbers for something that you can't really judge anyway. These numbers don't mean anything to you, they just give you the illusion of knowing what's going on. It's the "close door" button in an elevator.

[–] far_university1990@feddit.de -1 points 5 months ago

You think intel could? look at current and past name, they cannot

also you ask to encode difference of cpu into name, which i did. not to get good name that everyone can get from what they need know. people too different, would need to have different name for different people.

load more comments (3 replies)